Advance Inclusion in your workplace
Lead the way to create inclusive workplaces with expert support, tailored resources, and a vibrant member community. Inclusive Employers membership gives you the tools and insights to advance inclusion and make a lasting impact.
We are not lawyers at Inclusive Employers, but we are experienced practitioners and understand what employers need to know. With each piece of discrimination case law that we share the legal judgement is set into an employment context – what you need to know and what you should do.
This blog will explore the Mrs C A Hobbs v Avon Care Homes Ltd case. Keep reading to learn more about the background of the case and what employers should know.
The case: Mrs C A Hobbs v Avon Care Homes Ltd
- When did the case take place? January 2020
- Protected Characteristics involved? Race
- Legal Principle involved? Unfair constructive dismissal
- UK or EU Judgement? UK – Employment Tribunal (ET)
Why is this case important?
The Chief Executive claimed their rational for not hiring a black recruit was because of the attitudes of residents in care homes. They instructed Mrs Hobbs to act unlawfully, and to lie.
Stay up to date with the latest inclusion news and events
Gain expert guidance, tailored support, and resources to drive inclusion at work. Join a community of professionals, enhance your skills, and make a lasting impact on your organisation.
Explore the benefits of Membership
What is this case about?
A secretary was unfairly dismissed after her managing director told her she would not hire someone who was black during a phone conversation. The tribunal ruled Mrs C A Hobbs, who worked for Avon Care Homes from November 2015 until her resignation on 8 April 2019, was unfairly dismissed after she quit without notice following her managing director admitting she would not be hiring a candidate because of the colour of their skin.
Judge Christa Christensen said the racially charged actions of Avon Care Homes’ managing director, Christina Bila, “utterly undermined” Hobbs’ ability to trust her employer, and ruled the serious nature of the unlawful recruitment practices Hobbs was being asked to administer meant she was not required to raise a grievance before resigning.
“The claimant could not tolerate continuing to be employed on the basis that she was being instructed in terms to be complicit in recruitment practices that there were unlawful by reference to the provisions in the Equality Act relating to race discrimination,” Christensen said.
In her emailed resignation, Hobbs said: “[I am] unable to continue working for a company that has illegal working practices with regard to racial and colour prejudice held by the managing director. I am unwilling to lie to recruitment agencies as that makes me complicit with these illegal practices. Because of the issues regarding my reasons for having to leave, I am unable to work my notice as I believe this would be inappropriate knowing the office dynamic and your need to deal with the matters that I have brought up in this letter.”
What do I need to know?
Discrimination is discrimination. The recruit was suffering a detriment due to their race.
Next steps to becoming inclusion confident
Find out how Inclusive Employers can support your organisation in creating a more inclusive workplace. Fill in the form to learn more about Inclusive Employers membership and how we can help you make lasting, impactful changes.