Advance Inclusion in your workplace
Lead the way to create inclusive workplaces with expert support, tailored resources, and a vibrant member community. Inclusive Employers membership gives you the tools and insights to advance inclusion and make a lasting impact.
We are not lawyers at Inclusive Employers, but we are experienced practitioners and understand what employers need to know. With each piece of discrimination case law that we share the legal judgement is set into an employment context – what you need to know and what you should do.
This blog will explore the Disability Discrimination: Chief Constable of Norfolk v Coffey (2017) case. Keep reading to learn more about the background of the case and what employers should know.
Why is this case important?
The way in which the Equality Act 2010 is drafted means that employers can be liable for “perceptive discrimination”, which means a person can bring a discrimination claim even if they do not actually possess the protected characteristic in question. This ruling is the first time the Court of Appeal has considered this concept in the context of a perceived disability.
What is this case about?
In this case, the claimant had been a serving police officer with Wiltshire Police since 2011 but applied for a job transfer to Norfolk Police. The claimant suffered from hearing loss but had been accepted into Wiltshire Police following a function test. However, Norfolk Police rejected the claimant’s application to transfer forces because her hearing was just below the acceptable standard required for recruitment. Additionally, concerns that the claimant may have ended up being assigned restricted duties in the event that her hearing deteriorated further meant that her application was unsuccessful.
Stay up to date with the latest inclusion news and events
Gain expert guidance, tailored support, and resources to drive inclusion at work. Join a community of professionals, enhance your skills, and make a lasting impact on your organisation.
Explore the benefits of Membership
The tribunal found that the decision to reject the claimant’s application on this basis amounted to direct discrimination based upon the perception that the claimant was disabled or would be disabled in the future.
The employment appeals tribunal upheld the judgment, dismissing the employer’s attempt to appeal the decision of the tribunal at first instance.
Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 states ‘A’ directly discriminates against ‘B’ if he/she treats him less favourably ‘because of a protected characteristic’.
This definition is wide enough to incorporate discrimination on the grounds that someone may also be perceived as holding a protected characteristic therefore a claimant will be protected by the Equality Act 2010.
What do I need to know?
Many employment decisions involve taking medical advice on the likely future health of the individual. Occupational Health advice related to how health impacts employment and how employment impacts health. They are not advising on the implementation of their advice in the context of the Equality Act – this is a matter for the employer.
Next steps to becoming inclusion confident
Find out how Inclusive Employers can support your organisation in creating a more inclusive workplace. Fill in the form to learn more about Inclusive Employers membership and how we can help you make lasting, impactful changes.