Whistleblowing: Detriment claims will only succeed where disclosure materially influences the employer's detrimental treatment of the whistleblower

​This case concerns three claimants who alleged they had suffered a detriment because they blew the whistle about the extent of a colleague's qualifications. Overturning the EAT's decision the Court of Appeal found that the detriment suffered in this case was not materially influenced by the disclosures and rejected the claimants' whistleblowing complaints.

Join Inclusive Employers today and get access to the full content for all our articles!