TUPE: No service provision change where employees were organised by shift rather than by client

This case looked at whether there was an organised grouping of employees for the purposes of TUPE 2006 where shift patterns and working practices on the ground meant that some employees worked principally on a contract which went to another provider.

 

 

Please be aware that these updates do not contain specific legal advice - they are general legal updates provided in good faith.  Please seek specific advice for any legal questions

Tags: 
case law
DAC Beachcroft
equal pay
discrimination
discretionary share option
Sex Discrimination Act
Equal Pay Act
Court of Appeal
Equality Act